Perché prima o poi dimentichi il profumo svanito degli amori finiti.

Quel che rimane è l’odore pungente del mai vissuto.

È il pensiero di aver avuto accanto la felicità e di essersela lasciata sfuggire dalle mani, per gli occhi avvelenati sempre da ieri e mai dissetati da nuovi domani_

(Massimo Bisotti)

A 7 years-long Journey.

The spur arrived when I was 40 and, by chance, I read something about the Germanic New Medicine ( NMG ) and Dr. Hamer, the initiator.
A few lines describing briefly the "violators" concepts of the NMG, sparked in me an interest that took me by surprise.
I immediately bought a book that deepened those concepts.
In it I found laws, postulates, rocking statements totally unrelated with what I was hearing in respect of the medicine.
I ate up that first book with unbridled curiosity and gradually I understood that this unexpected interest was caused by the need to have answers to questions that I had for years.
Some examples:
"Why am I allergic to pollen since I was 8 and no one was able to cure me? Why are they trying to cure me with drugs whose side effects are far worse than the 'disease' itself? Why these drugs are not healing the cause of the disease, but just work on the symptoms?"

I asked the same questions to the doctors I met, looking for a way of healing. I was looking for answers in books, medical texts, in the scientific literature available on the web, without success. At best.
Oh yes, because when I found those answers, they were nothing but increasing my dissatisfaction and the perception of the state of helplessness and ignorance of medicine in relation to the so-called 'diseases'.

One example for all:
If you ask yourself, "Why am I allergic and others do not?”
The answer given by doctors was, and still is, as follows: "You are allergic because your antibodies have an excessive defensive reaction to the appearance of an external agent "the allergen" in your body."
This can be confirmed by the intolerants who are reading now.
Well, that answer is it? Is it this an answer that enter into the merits of the cause of the problem?
No.
It is still the description of an effect.

Sure I could feel proud of having" antibodies with superpowers", but my question is still pending ...
I tell you more; as I was insisting and asking: "Why are my antibodies responding in this way, while those of a non-allergic people have a normal response?"

The answers I got, the same all intolerant or ”sick” people general can hear, were those kind of answers that deny the foundation on which the scientific mind and the medicine itself are grounded. As an example: " What do you want me to tell you my dear, you're unlucky" or "The disease is unpredictable, like a tile that falls from the roof" or even "It could be hereditary, do you have any case of intolerance in your family?"
Inheritance!

That’s an other life jacket that doctors cling when they do not know what to say.
It deserve to be treated separately and in any case it falls into the category of non-response, however, it casts suspicion on the fact that we can be ill for some others faults.
What do you think about it?
Try the reader to think about the perfection of nature stained by a so big bug.

And where goes the sense of evolution if there was a possibility that a new individual was born equipped by a manufacturing defect, eventually programmed to occur only after a while?
When I talk about this topic with physicians, they immediately fume, grasping the statistics. Statistic figures certainly have a meaning, but medicine uses them in the wrong way when it is not investigating about the cause, looking into the reason of a 'disease'.

The right question in this case is the following: "Am I innocently inheriting the disease from birth or am I growing up, educated, shaped in a family environment and cultural life that during my early years shape my program habits, behavior, character, lifestyle, ability adaptation, my reactions to the positive and adverse events, and so on?"
It’s time to go back to my need to get the answers about the real cause of physical discomfort, or my 'disease', if you prefer.

THE CAUSE OF 'SICKNESS'
My new studies were giving me the first answers.
I was shaken, astonished, and they left me in disbelief at the beginning, frequently forcing me to deepen even more into in order to find more logical and perfect answers.
It is not my intention to go beyond the NMG since it is not the purpose of this article.

I will only say that every wisdom that guide it, it is based on logical research of the original cause of a 'disease' and on the interpretation of symptoms as a signal or an effect of it, and never on the disease itself.
Well! That said, you can imagine how pleased I am to have found in a long time, the answers I was looking for.
Finally, at age 40, I understood the true meaning of 'disease'.
To put it better, I realized that any 'disease' has a meaning .
A meaning.

If you just think it over, try to think of the state in which you are when you discover to be sick without a reason.
Try to think of the difference that can go in the case of a serious 'disease', the one that terrorize us - between someone sick convinced to be unlucky, hit by bad luck, by a divine punishment or a curse that hangs over his family ( inheritance) and another 'sick' aware that the same discomfort is a perfect biological program with a precise meaning.

Compare how a person can deal with a 'disease', maybe said as "incurable" or "bad bad" a person if he is afflicted with questions such as:
"Why me?" Or "What have I done wrong to deserve this?"
and on the other hand how someone else can fight, fully aware of the significance of that 'disease', when he knows that he can work on that message to resolve it completely.
No bad luck. No divine punishment.
Although the temptation is strong, I will not go into explanations or examples nor in the dynamics discussed in the texts I studied.

It is not my job.
I'm not even sure that the answers provided by the scientific sources I have studied are the only ones available.
They are certainly valid, but they do not rule out those other ancient Oriental disciplines that have reached the same conclusions, through different routes.
My goal is just to describe my own personal journey to those who are looking for answers, as I am.
In this regard, I must hasten to add that, having obtained the answers and understood the reason why we are 'sick', after the hangover of happiness unleashed by this new awareness, I immediately realized that I had done only half of my journey.
Yeah!
Here is the new question that aroused in me: "Now that I know why I’m 'sick' , how do I heal myself?"

Awareness is important, but it alone is not sufficient to heal yourself.
As I was able to understand, the NMG, while it represent an infallible and irreplaceable diagnostic tool, it does not tell us completely how to heal ourselves.
It explains us exactly what happens during the healing process, but it is not so precise about how you can start the healing process.
The other half of the journey was just to find out how to do it.

THE CURE
Luckily there are people, doctors, scientists, lovers of real research who are teaching us how to heal ourselves, and they are many more than I expected to find.
They are pure, brave, free from the bondage of the powers that bend the minds to the business reasons. They keep their moral integrity of truth seekers and they are not work for commission.

I have personally met many of them. They taught me that it is true that a symptom is always traceable to a definite conflict still alive and present in our minds, even if we do not realize it, it is also true and possible to work on the mental level to get rid of the symptom and the so-called 'disease'.
I tried it on myself. Are I recovered by allergy and, later, from other diseases.

I became more and more skilled in understanding the conflicts that lie behind a health problem, regardless of whether it's a serious thing or just a sore throat.
It is a difficult exercise at the beginning , but very interesting and evolving, as it is the practice to understand themselves, to learn how to deeper know ourselves.

The more we know ourselves, the investigation research of the conflict becomes easier and the problem resolution faster.
So I completed the second half of my journey in search of the missing answers.
I did not expect that this new ability to deal with the discomforts of health could turn into a method to prevent them at the same time.

To Know ourselves means to be able to predict our reactions to negative events and be prepared to address them in the best way to prevent them from turning into conflicts, which in turn intended to become 'diseases'.
I hope that my experience can be helpful to those who are reading.

I wrote it here with the awareness that everyone must make his own path, and it should not be read as the 'aim’ of a suggestion to anybody to follow the same steps.
The message that I would like to give is just to always claim for an answer to your questions, to never settle for false answers.
It is not easy. I know.

Very often the "non-answers-answers" are satisfying, they calm down and always set on the wrong track.
A true answer startles. Often it hurts. It is difficult to understand or accept it at the very first moment.
Beware then of the answers subside you, but, first of all...

Ask yourself QUESTIONS!

Here's to the crazy ones, the misfits, the rebels, the troublemakers, the round pegs in the square holes... the ones who see things differently -- they're not fond of rules... You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them, but the only thing you can't do is ignore them because they change things... they push the human race forward, and while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius, because the ones who are crazy enough to think that they can change the world, are the ones who do. Steve Jobs

Cancer is a natural phenomenon you can live with and it can heal itself. It’s confirmed by a Swiss research By Edward Campbell - Posted on January 4, 2014 What if you could live with cancer? The question sounds provocative, but the answer is fascinating: yes, you can. Do you want evidence of it? During the 8th National Congress of homeopathic medicine in Verona (1) , held in November 2008 , results were presented of autopsies performed in Switzerland on corpses of dead people not for disease - for example, in a car accident - and the results proved that many of them had one or more tumors, but they did not know they have them. This specific investigation revealed something shocking : 38% of women (between 40 and 50 years old) had a breast tumor (in situ); 48% of men over the age of 50 had a tumor (in situ ) to the prostate; 100 % of women and men over the age of 50 had a tumor (in situ) to the thyroid. A tumor in situ means a closed carcinoma, locked in his capsule, non-invasive, which can remain in this stage for a long time and even regress.

The clinical and social psychologist Luigi De Marchi, author of numerous essays known internationally, also confirms that cancer is not necessary lethal: "It isn’t odd that, in the autopsies on the bodies of the old farmers living in our most remote valleys, I found tumors naturally regressed and neutralised by the body itself: they are all people who were healed by one of their tumors and then they died for other reasons totally independent from any tumor pathology. " Exposing his doubts about the usefulness of diagnosis and cancer treatments, De Marchi ( 2 ) wonders: "If the highly ballyhooed diffusion of cancerous diseases in the recent decades throughout the western world could be an optical illusion, produced by the diffusion of early diagnosis of cancers that once went unnoticed and regressed naturally? And if the so trumpeted increase in cancer death was only the result of the scare to death caused by the early diagnosis and by the terrifying climate of the hospitals, or by the debilitation and intoxication produced by invasive, traumatic and toxic therapies used by the official Medicine?

Therefore, if all this was the outcome for the block caused by the anguish that diagnosis and therapies cause to the natural processes of healing and regression of tumors?'. Of course , we know that in the course of life it is "normal" to develop tumors, the same medicine knows that there are thousands of cancer cells produced by the body every day. They are later destroyed and/or swallowed up by the immune system when the body is working properly. Many cancers can regress even if our vital and healing energy (Vis Naturae Medicratix ) is free to act. But what happens to the vital mechanism of self-healing, if after a cancer diagnosis life is literally shocked by the information of the disease? It happens that the power is given to the disease rather than to the possibility of healing. And as Quantum Physics teaches us that the observer changes the observed and our reality depends on the "possibility" that we choose within the field, here is that the tumor is automatically strengthened.

Furthermore, at a biochemical level, we must not forget that chemotherapy destroys all the cells that are quickly reproducing themselves, such as cancerous ones, but also those of the immune system. Here’s how chemotherapy eliminates sick cells, but also those that should heal us. In fact, at best, chemotherapy can counteract the 80 % of the tumor, and the remaining 20 % will be eradicated only and ever by our body. Undergo a session of chemotherapy is therefore not always so favourable, especially in light of the fact that today we known that chemotherapies are a concurrent cause in the tumor’s growth. Any examples? An extensive research conducted for 23 years by prof. Hardin B. Jones, a physiologist at the University of California, in addition to reporting the use of falsified statistics, also proved that cancer patients who are NOT undergo to the three canonical therapies ( chemo, radio and surgery) survive longer or at least no less than those who receive these therapies.

( 3 ) Prof. Jones has shown that women suffering from breast cancer who refused conventional therapies showed a median survival of 12 years and a half, four times longer than that of three years reached by those who are subjected to comprehensive cares. ( 4 ) Another study published in The Lancet of 13.12.1975 (concerning 188 patients with inoperable bronchial carcinoma) shows that the average life of those treated with chemotherapy was 75 days, while those who received no treatments had a median survival of 120 days.

Feeling good about yourself: Feeling good about yourself is an arrival point, but first of all you shall ask yourself: who am I? And when I answer: I am a part of the Universe, a cell of a wonderful body, a grain of sand, I’m not here by accident, then you have done the most. Because I will not be okay with myself joining the community or bagging the approval of the others, but only when - driven by my nature, my existence who speaks through my instinct – I will intimately know that I have done what it was right to be done and I will feel a tangible Harmony in me. What can disturb that harmony? Always the society’s eye, always the eye of the other, always the expectations that I have not realized and the following disappointments after the failures of my expectations.

All this moves me to destabilization and I will not feel good about myself. Feeling good about ourselves is a state of grace that must be pursued as we have the tools to stay healthy. When we try these tools we must be aware of not being able to find them in our mind or in an external technique, temporary: we have to look for them, wanting to join ourselves with the awareness of being a part of the whole. It may seem a question that rotate on itself, and in a sense it is like that, because if I identify myself in my personality, if

I have social needs, expectations that must be met, the achievement of feeling good about myself will go through the procedures always susceptible to ups and downs, as I always will be relied on others, to the results that I can achieve and the impact that I have on the others, how other people look at me, how they judge me: I will be satisfied with myself when I have their approval and unsatisfied when I will not have it. If I behave as an energetic individual that makes many experiments with no other goal in life than to be able to understand me, then I will be satisfied, pleased when I’ll find the answers free of expectations out of that of living in harmony. This harmony will be tangible in the moment when I will take away from my life everything is external. The externality can be an incentive to reflect but not to be restricted. If another person sees me differently than I see myself he doesn’t have automatically right, but he just makes me think; then after reflection if I get back to the idea I had about myself and that it is different from the one expressed by that person, peacefully I have to continue to be myself.

So feeling good about ourselves goes beyond the acceptance of the others, beyond the approval of society and even beyond the results we achieve with our actions: I may have a very disappointing result in a practical field, but in my act, in carrying out that situation I have lavished so much knowledge of myself, so right and positive intention, that in the end I’ll be more than pleased by the outcoming energy, even when the practical result should be disappointing. At this point, however, I'll be fine, even if to the other’s eyes I can seem a failure, a turncoat or a not reliable person

 Sarebbe bello, con le persone a noi più care, cogliere l'occasione di ogni Natale per fare il punto sulla nostra vita:

Cosa mi ha insegnato la vita quest'anno?
Sono diventata più forte o più debole?
Vedo ancora i problemi con gli stessi occhi dello scorso anno? O forse alcuni sono diventati più leggeri e altri più pesanti?
C'è stato in particolare qualcosa che mi ha stra-volto (volto altrove) lo sguardo? E se c'è stato, ne ho avuto paura e l'ho messo sotto il cuscino, o ne ho fatto un motore che mi sta portando verso nuovi lidi?

Pensa che dono grande sarebbe se ragionassimo sulle nostre vite ad alta voce tutti insieme... Ogni esperienza diventerebbe ricchezza per gli altri.

Questo per me dovrebbe essere il Natale. Occasione di confronto con se stessi in primis, con gli altri poi, per consapevolizzare i risultati raggiunti e ripartire, rinascere, con obiettivi sempre più evoluti.

Buon Natale a tutti,
di cuore!

Bianca

--------------

It would be nice if we take the opportunity of every Christmas, to take stock of our lives with the people we are close to:

What has life taught me this year?
Am I stronger or weaker?
Am I still seeing problems with the last year eyes? Or maybe are some of them lighter and some other heavier now?
Did anything overturned me (turned my gaze over)? And if it’s so, does it scared me and I hided it under the pillow, or I made it an engine that is now taking me to new shores?

Imagine what a great gift would be if we think about our lives out loud and all together ... Any experience would become a value for the others.

This should be Christmas for me. An opportunity for discussion with yourself first, then with the other, to empower the achievements and start again, reborn, with more and more advanced goals.

Merry Christmas to all,
With love!

Bianca